The introduction of the judicial management scheme

This project paper will focus on one key question, viz. is it time to amend the Companies Act 1965 in order to welcome the judicial management scheme, as an another alternative to liquidation, other than the existing scheme of arrangement under s 176 of the Companies Act 1965? In order to answer thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Choo, Beng Soo
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/1/s811809.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/2/s811809_abstract.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/
Abstract Abstract here
_version_ 1855573912831655936
author Choo, Beng Soo
author_facet Choo, Beng Soo
author_sort Choo, Beng Soo
description This project paper will focus on one key question, viz. is it time to amend the Companies Act 1965 in order to welcome the judicial management scheme, as an another alternative to liquidation, other than the existing scheme of arrangement under s 176 of the Companies Act 1965? In order to answer this question, the existing scheme of arrangement provided under s 176 of the Act has to be examined and studied carefully. The objectives of this project paper are to identify the benefits and shortfalls of s 176 of the Companies Act 1965, i.e. scheme of arrangement as well as to examine the judicial management scheme that proposed by the Corporate Law Reform Committee and the Companies Bill 2013. It also involves comparative study with other jurisdiction namely with the Republic of Singapore and to suggest any necessary improvements or amendments on the current law. The study found that the despite the obvious lacking of s 176 of the Companies Act 1965, i.e. scheme of arrangement, the introduction of the Companies Bill 2013 did nothing much in improving it. Thus, it is important to introduce the judicial management scheme in Malaysia, as prima facie, it able to cure the issue of classification of creditors that long existed in the scheme of arrangement. Upon reviewing the judicial management provisions in the Republic of Singapore, it seems that our Companies Bill 2013 had adopted most of it, but there are still room for improvement, for example, during the moratorium period, the court is given the power to dismiss the petition and considers that the judicial management order was presented frivolously, it may make such orders as it thinks just and equitable to redress any injustice that may have been caused, as provided under s 227B(9) of the Singaporean Companies Act. And this should be adopted by the Companies Bill 2013 as it able to avoid any injustice being caused.
format Thesis
id oai:etd.uum.edu.my:4215
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
English
publishDate 2014
record_format EPrints
record_pdf Restricted
spelling oai:etd.uum.edu.my:42152022-05-18T01:56:15Z https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/ The introduction of the judicial management scheme Choo, Beng Soo K Law (General) This project paper will focus on one key question, viz. is it time to amend the Companies Act 1965 in order to welcome the judicial management scheme, as an another alternative to liquidation, other than the existing scheme of arrangement under s 176 of the Companies Act 1965? In order to answer this question, the existing scheme of arrangement provided under s 176 of the Act has to be examined and studied carefully. The objectives of this project paper are to identify the benefits and shortfalls of s 176 of the Companies Act 1965, i.e. scheme of arrangement as well as to examine the judicial management scheme that proposed by the Corporate Law Reform Committee and the Companies Bill 2013. It also involves comparative study with other jurisdiction namely with the Republic of Singapore and to suggest any necessary improvements or amendments on the current law. The study found that the despite the obvious lacking of s 176 of the Companies Act 1965, i.e. scheme of arrangement, the introduction of the Companies Bill 2013 did nothing much in improving it. Thus, it is important to introduce the judicial management scheme in Malaysia, as prima facie, it able to cure the issue of classification of creditors that long existed in the scheme of arrangement. Upon reviewing the judicial management provisions in the Republic of Singapore, it seems that our Companies Bill 2013 had adopted most of it, but there are still room for improvement, for example, during the moratorium period, the court is given the power to dismiss the petition and considers that the judicial management order was presented frivolously, it may make such orders as it thinks just and equitable to redress any injustice that may have been caused, as provided under s 227B(9) of the Singaporean Companies Act. And this should be adopted by the Companies Bill 2013 as it able to avoid any injustice being caused. 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/1/s811809.pdf text en https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/2/s811809_abstract.pdf Choo, Beng Soo (2014) The introduction of the judicial management scheme. Masters thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Choo, Beng Soo
The introduction of the judicial management scheme
thesis_level Master
title The introduction of the judicial management scheme
title_full The introduction of the judicial management scheme
title_fullStr The introduction of the judicial management scheme
title_full_unstemmed The introduction of the judicial management scheme
title_short The introduction of the judicial management scheme
title_sort introduction of the judicial management scheme
topic K Law (General)
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/1/s811809.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/2/s811809_abstract.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4215/
work_keys_str_mv AT choobengsoo theintroductionofthejudicialmanagementscheme
AT choobengsoo introductionofthejudicialmanagementscheme