| सारांश: | Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a strategy that is commonly used to improve the
alignment of business and Information Technology (IT) within an enterprise.
Implementing an EA is a sophisticated, lengthy, and costly process which tends to face
serious failure. Thus, it is essential to perform a successful and thorough evaluation at
the post-implementation stage of an EA project to evaluate how much the developed
Information Systems (ISs) and IT solutions have succeeded in achieving its
predetermined objectives and improving the integration and stability of enterprise.
Most existing evaluation models do not provide structured and comprehensive way
to cover EA implementation aspects. As a consequence, EA projects may face
inadequate adaptation for future changes, lack of structured guideline for evaluating the
EA artefacts, and lack of structured practices for continual improvement of EA
implementation. Moreover, without having structured and theory-based model for
evaluating EA artefacts, the enterprise decision makers cannot achieve the targeted
goals of EA implementation project, and they may waste time and budget. To address
the issues, this thesis proposes the post implemented method to assist the implemented
EA within the enterprise, which combine solid theory and good practices. Moreover, the
proposed method focuses on two important dimensions which are crucial functionality
and effectiveness. This thesis has gone through three phases: preparation, development,
and evaluation. The first phase provides the foundations and requirements of the
proposed method based on Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and interviews with EA
practitioners for the required practices and factors that affect the EA implementation
evaluation. The second phase focuses on the development of the method for EA
implementation evaluation. Moreover, the basis for the proposed method are the
program theory and IS Evaluation Theory using design science approach. Finally, the
proposed method is validated by means of two case studies, cross case analysis and expert reviews. Accumulated results from the evaluation reveals that the proposed
method is usable and effective and it has the capability to facilitate the success of EA
projects.
|
|---|
