Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh

Since implementation of the new revision of ECE R14.07, there is a need to change seatbelt anchorage (SBA) design specification at center position of passenger seat from two points SBA to three points SBA. This study is conducted to investigate which shoulder seatbelt anchorage position is prefer...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
主要作者: Mohd Bukhari, Mat Salleh
格式: Thesis
出版: 2017
主题:
_version_ 1849734591708921856
author Mohd Bukhari, Mat Salleh
author_facet Mohd Bukhari, Mat Salleh
author_sort Mohd Bukhari, Mat Salleh
description Since implementation of the new revision of ECE R14.07, there is a need to change seatbelt anchorage (SBA) design specification at center position of passenger seat from two points SBA to three points SBA. This study is conducted to investigate which shoulder seatbelt anchorage position is preferred in term of ergonomics assessment. The study focus on perceived comfort/discomfort in specific task of reaching for the seatbelt tongue between two types of SBA position. Two different types of passenger car which are fitted with two different types of SBA position at the second row of the passenger seat were chosen. The two types of SBA position involved in the study are SBA at roof panel and SBA at seatback. Outcomes of the study are determined by the level of exertion and postural analysis using the Borg RPE Scale and the Comfort Index method, respectively. Results of the Borg RPE Scale and Comfort Index agreed that SBA at roof panel is more comfortable compared to SBA at seatback. The ergonomic assessment carried out in the study had managed to identify the level of exertion and body segment that heavily affected the overall scores. Significant findings of the study help to provide value added to ergonomics design and help designers during early stage of a new vehicle development. Most importantly, ease of use and effectiveness characteristics shown by both methodologies suitable to be applied in any situation and industry. In conclusion, the findings of the study have proven that in reaching for the seatbelt tongue task, SBA at roof panel is more comfortable compared to SBA at seatback.
format Thesis
id oai:studentsrepo.um.edu.my:7709
institution Universiti Malaya
publishDate 2017
record_format eprints
spelling oai:studentsrepo.um.edu.my:77092020-05-31T22:53:17Z Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh Mohd Bukhari, Mat Salleh T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Since implementation of the new revision of ECE R14.07, there is a need to change seatbelt anchorage (SBA) design specification at center position of passenger seat from two points SBA to three points SBA. This study is conducted to investigate which shoulder seatbelt anchorage position is preferred in term of ergonomics assessment. The study focus on perceived comfort/discomfort in specific task of reaching for the seatbelt tongue between two types of SBA position. Two different types of passenger car which are fitted with two different types of SBA position at the second row of the passenger seat were chosen. The two types of SBA position involved in the study are SBA at roof panel and SBA at seatback. Outcomes of the study are determined by the level of exertion and postural analysis using the Borg RPE Scale and the Comfort Index method, respectively. Results of the Borg RPE Scale and Comfort Index agreed that SBA at roof panel is more comfortable compared to SBA at seatback. The ergonomic assessment carried out in the study had managed to identify the level of exertion and body segment that heavily affected the overall scores. Significant findings of the study help to provide value added to ergonomics design and help designers during early stage of a new vehicle development. Most importantly, ease of use and effectiveness characteristics shown by both methodologies suitable to be applied in any situation and industry. In conclusion, the findings of the study have proven that in reaching for the seatbelt tongue task, SBA at roof panel is more comfortable compared to SBA at seatback. 2017 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/7709/4/ERGONOMICS_ASSESSMENT_FOR_SEAT_BELT_ANCHORAGE_LOCATION_AT_REAR_CENTER_SEAT.pdf Mohd Bukhari, Mat Salleh (2017) Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh. Masters thesis, University of Malaya. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/7709/
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Mohd Bukhari, Mat Salleh
Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh
title Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh
title_full Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh
title_fullStr Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh
title_full_unstemmed Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh
title_short Ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat / Mohd Bukhari Mat Salleh
title_sort ergonomics assessment for seat belt achorage location at rear center seat mohd bukhari mat salleh
topic T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
url-record http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/7709/
work_keys_str_mv AT mohdbukharimatsalleh ergonomicsassessmentforseatbeltachoragelocationatrearcenterseatmohdbukharimatsalleh