Malaysian English language teachers beliefs, roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | أطروحة |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
2024
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=12140 |
| Abstract | Abstract here |
| _version_ | 1855626299446394880 |
|---|---|
| author | Siti Nur Yusof |
| author_facet | Siti Nur Yusof |
| author_sort | Siti Nur Yusof |
| description | |
| format | Thesis |
| id | upsi-12140 |
| institution | Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | sWADAH |
| record_pdf | Restricted |
| spelling | upsi-121402025-05-27 Malaysian English language teachers beliefs, roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools 2024 Siti Nur Yusof P Language and Literature <p>This study explores the beliefs, roles and practices of Malaysian English language</p><p>teachers concerning learner autonomy and how they develop autonomous learning in</p><p>secondary school classrooms. The objectives of the research are to gain insights into</p><p>teachers' beliefs on learner autonomy and understand the practices they employ to</p><p>develop autonomous learning among their learners. The study adopts a mixed-method</p><p>approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. A total of</p><p>172 English language teachers participated in the first phase of the research, responding</p><p>to a questionnaire to provide quantitative data on their beliefs, roles and practices on</p><p>learner autonomy. For the second phase, semi-structured interviews and classroom</p><p>observations were conducted with a selected group of teachers to gain in-depth insights</p><p>into their practices in developing learner autonomy. The findings from the survey</p><p>revealed that teachers have positive beliefs about learner autonomy and its</p><p>development. These teachers believe that motivated language learners are more likely</p><p>to develop learner autonomy. The teachers also view that learner autonomy is a concept</p><p>that is suitable for Malaysian learners. Thematic analysis of the data revealed that the</p><p>majority of teachers held positive beliefs about learner autonomy and recognised its</p><p>importance in enhancing students' language learning experiences. Teachers</p><p>acknowledged the benefits of promoting self-directed learning and developing students'</p><p>abilities to set goals, select appropriate learning strategies, and monitor their own</p><p>progress. Regarding the implementation of autonomous learning, the findings indicated</p><p>that most teachers preferred group work as a key strategy. They incorporated group</p><p>work into various activities to optimize their collaborative learning experiences. The</p><p>implications of this research offer valuable insights for teacher training programs and</p><p>curriculum development in English language education. By understanding teachers'</p><p>beliefs and practices, educational institutions can design targeted interventions to</p><p>support teachers in effectively fostering learner autonomy, ultimately enhancing</p><p>students' language learning outcomes.</p> 2024 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=12140 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=12140 text eng N/A openAccess Doctoral Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi <p>Ahmad, N., Yaakub, R. & Megat Abdul Rahim, P. R. (2004). Towards learner autonomy in teaching English in Malaysia. A conference paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on ELT in China, Beijing (2125 May 2004).</p><p>Alderson, J.C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. London: Continuum.</p><p>Allwright, D. & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on language classroom: an introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Alonazi, S. M. (2017). The role of teachers in promoting learner autonomy in secondary schools in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 183-202. doi:10.5539/elt.v10n7p183.</p><p>Antonius, R. (2003). Interpreting quantitative data with SPSS. London; Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.</p><p>Aoki, N. (2002). Aspects of teacher autonomy: Capacity, freedom, and responsibility. In Learner autonomy 7: Challenges to research and practice (pp. 111 135). Dublin, Ireland: Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd.</p><p>Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL Learners Challenges in Speaking English in Malaysian Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 983991.</p><p>Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English Language Education Reform in Malaysian Primary Schools. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 22(3), 65-78.</p><p>Babbie, E. R. (2017). The basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.</p><p>Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.</p><p>Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248287. </p><p>Benavent, G. T., & Peamara, S. S.-R. (2011). Use of authentic materials in the ESP classroom. Encuentro, 20, 8994.</p><p>Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 18 34). New York: Longman.</p><p>Benson, P. (2000). Autonomy as a learners and teachers right. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 111117). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.</p><p>Benson, P. (2008). Teachers and learners perspectives on autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 1532). Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins PubCo.</p><p>Benson, P. (2009). Making sense of autonomy in language learning. In R. Pemberton, S. Toogood, & A. Barfield (Eds.), Maintaining control: Autonomy and language learning (pp. 1326). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.</p><p>Benson, P. (2010a). Measuring autonomy: Should we put our ability to test? In A. Paran & L. Sercu (Eds.), Testing the untestable in language education (pp. 7797). Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.</p><p>Benson, P. (2010b). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259275. </p><p>Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Harlow; New York: Longman/Pearson.</p><p>Benson, P. (2013). Learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 839843.</p><p>Benson, P. (Ed.). (2007). Learner autonomy 8: Teacher and learner perspectives. Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources.</p><p>Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Introduction: Autonomy and independence in language learning. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 112). New York: Longman.</p><p>Borg, M. (2001). Teachers beliefs. ELT Journal: English Language Teaching Journal, 55(2), 186188.</p><p>Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81 109.</p><p>Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London ; New York, NY: Continuum.</p><p>Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012a). Learner autonomy: English language teachers beliefs and practices (ELT Research Paper 12-07). London: British Council.</p><p>Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012b). Teachers beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 66(3), 283292.</p><p>Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p><p>Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Ciekanski, M. (2007). Fostering learner autonomy: Power and reciprocity in the relationship between language learner and language learning adviser. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1), 111127.</p><p>Cirocki, A., Anam, S., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2019). Readiness for Autonomy in English Language Learning: The Case of Indonesian High School Students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 1-18. doi: 10.30466/ijltr.2019.120695</p><p>Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23, 13-20.</p><p>Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, [England]; New York: Routledge.</p><p>Coleman, M. (2012). Interviews. In A. R. Briggs, M. Coleman, & M. Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in educational leadership and management (4th ed., pp. 250 265). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.</p><p>Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal 54(2), 109-117.</p><p>Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Council of Europe. (2017). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Provisional Edition.</p><p>Crabbe, D. (1993). Fostering autonomy from within the classroom: The teachers responsibility. System, 21(4), 443452.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles : New Delhi: Sage.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral reserach (2nd ed., pp. 4568). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. </p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Dam, L. (2008). In-service teacher education for learner autonomy. Independence, 43, 21-28.</p><p>Deci, E.L., Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and the intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1-10.</p><p>Deci, E.L., Schwartz, A.J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R.M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642-650.</p><p>Denscombe, M. (2003). The good research guide for small scale social research projects (2nd Ed). New York: Open University Press.</p><p>Dickinson, L. (1987). Self - instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation a literature review. System, 23(2), 165 174.</p><p>Drnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273284.</p><p>Drnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(03), 117135.</p><p>Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p><p>Dornyei, Z. (2014). Motivation in second language learning. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 518531). Boston: National Geographic Learning.</p><p>Drnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: Retrodictive qualitative modelling in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(01), 8091.</p><p>Drnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.</p><p>Duff, P. A. (2014). Communicative language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 1530). Boston: National Geographic Learning.</p><p>Egel, I.. P. (2009). Learner autonomy in the language classroom: From teacher dependency to learner independency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 20232026.</p><p>Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the classroom. Oxford : Blackwell Publishing.</p><p>Eom, S.B., Ashill, N., & Wen, H.J. (2006). The determinants of students perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.</p><p>Esch, E. (1997). Learner training for autonomous language learning. In Benson P. & Voller P. (Eds.) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 164- 176). London: Longman.</p><p>Feryok, A. (2010). Language teacher cognitions: Complex dynamic systems? System, 38(2), 272279.</p><p>Feryok, A. (2013). Teaching for learner autonomy: The teachers role and sociocultural theory. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 213225.</p><p>Fincham, J.E. (2008). Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72 (2): 43.</p><p>Fonseka, E. A. G. (2003). Autonomy in a resource-poor setting: Enhancing the carnivalesque. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 147163). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Fosnot,C.T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C.T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 8-33). Newark, NJ: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F., & Masgoret, A. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 344-362.</p><p>Gay, L. R., & Airasia, P. W. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for anlaysis and application (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.</p><p>Gremmo, M.-J., & Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System, 23(2), 151164.</p><p>Hasim, Z., & Zakaria, A. R. (2016). ESL Teachers knowledge on learner autonomy. In Knowledge, Service, Tourism & Hospitality: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Management and Technology in Knowledge, Service, Tourism & Hospitality 2015 (SERVE 2015). CRC Press.</p><p>Hasim, Z., Barnard, R., Mohtar, T. & Maarof, N. (2016). The role of the facilitator in language teaching: Student teachers' conceptualizations in Malaysia. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 21-36.</p><p>Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.</p><p>Holmes, Intertextuality in EAP: an African context, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7388, 2004.</p><p>Humphreys, G., & Wyatt, M. (2013). Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal, 5(6).</p><p>Ikonen, A. (2013). Promotion of learner autonomy in the EFL classroom: the students' view (Master thesis). Retrieved from University of Jyvskyl, Jyvskyl, Finland.</p><p>Ills, . (2012). Learner Autonomy Revisited. ELT Journal Special Issue, 66, 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs044.</p><p>Inozu, J. (2011). Developing learner autonomy in the language class in Turkey: Voices from the classroom. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 523531.</p><p>Islam, C., & Mares, C. (2003). Adapting classroom materials. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 86100). London: Continuum.</p><p>Ismail, F.; Yunus, M.M.; Zahidi, A. Promotion of learner autonomy: Beliefs and practices from the ESL teachers perspectives. Int.J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev. 2020, 9, 309317.</p><p>Ismail, N., & Yusof, M. A. M. (2012). Using language learning contracts as a strategy to promote learner autonomy among ESL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 472480.</p><p>Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (Fifth edition..). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.</p><p>Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 1426.</p><p>Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112133.</p><p>Joshi, K. R. (2011). Learner perceptions and teacher beliefs about learner autonomy in language learning. Journal of NELTA, 16(12), 1229.</p><p>Krashen, S. D. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 4577). London: Academic Press.</p><p>Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607610.</p><p>Kuchah, K., & Smith, R. (2011). Pedagogy of autonomy for difficult circumstances: From practice to principles. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 119 140.</p><p>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post- method. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p>Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global society. New York, USA: Routledge.</p><p>Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2015). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 121.</p><p>Lau, K. L. (2013). Chinese language teachers perception and implementation of self- regulated learning-based instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 5666.</p><p>Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.</p><p>Little, D. (1994) Learner autonomy: A theoretical construct and its practical application. Die Neueren Sprachen , 93(5): 430442.</p><p>Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175181.</p><p>Little, D. (1999a). Learner autonomy is more than a Western cultural construct. In S. Cotterall & D. Crabbe (Eds.), Learner autonomy in language learning: Defining the field and effecting change (pp.11-18) . Germany: Peter Lang.</p><p>Little, D. (1999b). Strategies, counselling and cultural difference: why we need an anthropological understanding of learner autonomy. Bells: Barcelona English language and literature studies , 10 , 17-33.</p><p>Little, D. (2007a). Introduction: Reconstructing learner and teacher autonomy in language education. In A. Barfield & S. H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation (pp. 112). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Little, D. (2007b). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1).</p><p>Little, D. (2009a). Language learner autonomy and the European language portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42(02), 222233.</p><p>Little, D., Devitt, S. M., & Singleton, D. M. (1994). Learning foreign languages from authentic texts: Theory and practice. Dublin: Authentik.</p><p>Littlewood, W. (1996). Autonomy: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427 435.</p><p>Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 7194.</p><p>Littlewood, W. (2010). Chinese and Japanese students conceptions of the Ideal English Lesson. RELC Journal, 41(1), 4658.</p><p>Long, M. H. (1980). Inside the black box: methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30, 1, 1-42.</p><p>Macaro, E. (1997). Target language, collaborative learning and autonomy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.</p><p>Macaro, E. (2001). Learner strategies in second and foreign language classrooms. London: Continuum.</p><p>Mackenzie, A. S. (2007). Commentary on part three: Teachers, transitions and time: Learning for educational change. In B. Andrew & S. H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation (pp. 222230). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Masouleh and R. B. Jooneghani, Autonomous learning: a teacher-less learning! Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 55, pp. 835842, 2012.</p><p>May, T. (2011). Social Research: Issues, methods and process (4th ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.</p><p>Merriam, S.B. (1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.</p><p>Miguel, D. S. L. (2019). The Relationship Between Teachers Beliefs, Teachers Behaviors, and Teachers Professional Development: A Literature Review. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 1018.</p><p>Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage Publications.</p><p>Ministry of Education (2015). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Bahasa Inggeris Tingkatan 1. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.</p><p>Ministry of Education (2016). Buku penerangan KSSM. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.</p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.</p><p>Mohamad Uri, N.F. & Abd Aziz, M.S. (2018). Implementation of CEFR in Malaysia: Teachers awareness and the Challenges. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(3).</p><p>Morrison, B. (2011). Building on experience, seeking new perspectives. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives (pp. 39). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.</p><p>Muliyah, P., & Aminatun, D. (2020). Teaching English for specific purposes in vocational high school: Teachers beliefs and practices. Journal of English Teaching, 6(2), 122-133.</p><p>Mukundan, J., Amelia, L.C.H. & Nimehchisalem, V. (2012). Distribution of articles in Malaysian secondary school English language textbooks. English Language and Literature Studies, 2 (2), 62-70.</p><p>Murase, F. (2011). Learner autonomy in Asia: How Asian teachers and students see themselves. In T. Muller, S. Herder, J. Adamson, & S. Brown (Eds.), Innovating EFL teaching in Asia.</p><p>Murase, F. (2015). Measuring language learner autonomy: Problems and possibilities. In C. J. Everhard & L. Murphy (Eds.), Assessment and autonomy in language learning (pp. 3563). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Nakata, Y. (2011). Teachers readiness for promoting learner autonomy: A study of Japanese EFL high school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 900 910.</p><p>Nguyen, N. T. (2014). Learner autonomy in language learning: Teachers beliefs. (Doctor of Philosophy), Queensland University of Technology.</p><p>Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classroom, a guide for teacher-initiated action. New York: Prentice-Hall.</p><p>Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Oxford, R. (1999) Anxiety and the language learner: New insights. In J. Arnold and H. Douglas Brown (Eds.) Affect in Language Learning (pp. 5867). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 75 91). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. </p><p>Paiva, V. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in second language acquisition from the perspective of complex adaptive system. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 57 72). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.</p><p>Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307332.</p><p>Palfreyman, D. (2003). Introduction: Culture and learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 119). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Palfreyman, D. M. (2014). The ecology of learner autonomy. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 175191). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Pennycook, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 3553). New York: Longman.</p><p>Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), 380390.</p><p>Rashid, R. A., Abdul Rahman, S. B., & Yunus, K. (2017). Reforms in the policy of English language teaching in Malaysia. Policy Futures in Education, 15(1), 100112.</p><p>Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5).</p><p>Reinders, H., & White, C. (2011). Learner autonomy and new learning environments. Retrieved from http://unitec.researchbank.ac.nz/handle/10652/2497.</p><p>Reiss, S. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Teaching of Psychology, 39(2), 152 156.</p><p>Renganathan, S. (2023). English language education in rural schools in Malaysia: A systematic review of research. Educational Review, 75(4), 787-804.</p><p>Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitude and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T.Buttery, E. Guyton (Eds.). Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.</p><p>Rogers, C. V., & Medley, F. W. (1988). Language with a purpose: Using authentic materials in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 21(5), 467478.</p><p>Scharle, A., & Szab, A. (2000). Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. Ernst Klett Sprachen.</p><p>Sinclair, B. (2000). Learner autonomy: The next phase? In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 414). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.</p><p>Sinclair, B. (2008). Multiple Voices: Negotiating Pathways Towards Teacher and Learner Autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and Teacher Autonomy: Concepts, Realities and Responses (pp 237-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.</p><p>Slavin, R. E. (2007). Educational research in an age of accountability. Boston, Mass.: Pearson.</p><p>Smith, R. C. (2001). Group work for autonomy in Asia: Insights from teacher- research. In L. Dam (Ed.), Learner autonomy: New insight (pp. 7081). England: Catchline for AILA.</p><p>Smith, R. C. (2003). Pedagogy for autonomy as (becoming-) appropriate methodology. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 129 146). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.</p><p>Sukyadi, D., & Mardiani, R. (2011). The washback effect of the English national examination (ENE on English teachers classroom teaching and students learning. K@ta, 13(1), 96111.</p><p>Swanborn, P. G. (2010). Case study research: What, why and how? London: SAGE.</p><p>Tajularipin Sulaiman, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub & Suriati Sulaiman (2015). Curriculum Change in English Language Curriculum Advocates Higher Order Thinking Skills and Standards-Based Assessments in Malaysian Primary Schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 494-500.</p><p>Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics; Cambridge, 30, 128 148.</p><p>Talmy, S. (2011). The interview as collaborative achievement: Interaction, identity, and ideology in a speech event. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 2542.</p><p>Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods reserach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 142). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.</p><p>Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143179.</p><p>Truong, M. H. & Nguyen, T. P. T. (2023). Vietnamese high school teachers beliefs about promoting EFL learner autonomy in writing skills development. Issues in Educational Research, 33(2), 798-820. http://www.iier.org.au/iier33/truong.pd</p><p>Tsui, A. (1995). Introducing classroom interaction. England: Penguin Publication.</p><p>Ueki, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2013). Forming a clearer image of the ideal L2 self: The L2 motivational self system and learner autonomy in a Japanese EFL context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 238252.</p><p>Ushioda, E. (1996). The role of motivation. Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources.</p><p>Vaiciuniene, V., & Uzpaliene, D. (2012). Authenticity in the context of technologically enriched ESP. Socialines Technologijos, 2(1), n/a.</p><p>Van Lier, L. (2005). Case study. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.195-208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</p><p>Wang, P. (2011). Constructivism and Learner Autonomy in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: To what Extent does Theory Inform Practice? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 273-277.</p><p>Wang, Y., & Ryan, J. (2023). The complexity of control shift for learner autonomy: A mixed-method case study of Chinese EFL teachers practice and cognition. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 518-543.</p><p>Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., Jung, J., & Dearman, J. K. (2011). Strategic and self- regulated learning for the 21st century: The merging of skill, will and self regulation. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives (pp. 4154). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.</p><p>Wichayathian, N., & Reinders, H. (2015). A teachers perspective on autonomy and self- access: From theory to perception to practice. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 0(0), 116.</p><p>Wilkinson, D., & Birmingham, P. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. New York; London: Routledge.</p><p>Wood, D. (1998). How Children Think and Learn: The Social Contexts of Cognitive Development. UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</p><p>Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making, and classroom practice. Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Yang, N. D. (1998). Exploring a new role for teachers: Promoting learner autonomy. System, 26(1), 127-135.</p><p>Yen Dwee, C. & Anthony, E. (2017). Learner autonomy in university English classroom: Teachers perceptions and practices. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(2), 19-25.</p><p>Yin, R. (1994). Applications of case study research. London: Sage Publications.</p><p>Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th.Ed). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.</p><p>Yunus, M.M. & Arshad, N.D.M. (2015). ESL Teachers Perceptions toward the Practices and Prospects of Autonomous Language Learning. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 41-51.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p> |
| spellingShingle | P Language and Literature Siti Nur Yusof Malaysian English language teachers beliefs, roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools |
| thesis_level | PhD |
| title | Malaysian English language teachers beliefs, roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools |
| title_full | Malaysian English language teachers beliefs, roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools |
| title_fullStr | Malaysian English language teachers beliefs, roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools |
| title_full_unstemmed | Malaysian English language teachers beliefs, roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools |
| title_short | Malaysian English language teachers beliefs, roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools |
| title_sort | malaysian english language teachers beliefs roles and practices on learners autonomy in secondary schools |
| topic | P Language and Literature |
| url | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=12140 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sitinuryusof malaysianenglishlanguageteachersbeliefsrolesandpracticesonlearnersautonomyinsecondaryschools |