The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Nagalaxmy Markandan
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2017
Subjects:	LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=4763
Abstract	Abstract here

_version_	1855625776761667584
author	Nagalaxmy Markandan
author_facet	Nagalaxmy Markandan
author_sort	Nagalaxmy Markandan
description
format	Thesis
id	upsi-4763
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
language	English
publishDate	2017
record_format	sWADAH
record_pdf	Restricted
spelling	upsi-47632020-02-27 The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district 2017 Nagalaxmy Markandan LB Theory and practice of education <p>This study aimed to analyze the implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu District, and to determine the relationship between the implementation of level I science curriculum and the teachers understanding. A mixed method approach was used. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaire from 127 science teachers, meanwhile the qualitative data collected through interviews, classroom observations and document analysis. The quantitative data were analyzed through SPSS, while the interview data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti. The findings show there is a significant positive relationship between the teachers understanding and the translation of science curriculum into the lesson plan. A significant positive relationship is also found between the teachers understanding and the strategies used in teaching science. There is also a positive relationship between the teachers understanding and the assessment methods carried out in the classroom. Nevertheless, insufficient of time in completing the learning standard and insufficient apparatus have become issues and challenges due to less understanding of the content of level I science curriculum. In conclusion, there is a positive relationship between all studied aspects of teachers understanding towards the reformed primary science curriculum and its implementation. In implication, the study indicates that there is a need in professional development trainings for teachers who are teaching level I science in order to maximize curriculum implementation at the classroom level.</p> 2017 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=4763 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=4763 text eng N/A openAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). Pengajian kurikulum. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Abdul Rahman, A. (1987). Curriculum innovation in Malaysia: The case of KBSR.</p><p>Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London Institute of Education.</p><p></p><p>Abdul Rahman, S. B. (2007). The implementation of the Contemporary Children's</p><p>Literature program in Malaysian primary schools. Unpublished doctoral</p><p>dissertation, University of Reading.</p><p></p><p>Airini, C., McNaughton, S., Langley, J., & Sauni, P. (2007). What educational reform</p><p>means: Lessons from teachers, research and policy working together for student</p><p>success. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(1), 3154.</p><p></p><p>Akerson,V., Buck,G., Donnelly,L. Nargundi-Joshi, V. & Weiland, I. (2011). The</p><p>importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years.</p><p>Journal of Educational Technology, 20, 537-549.</p><p></p><p>Allan, A.G., Boschee, F., Whitehead, B.M., & Boschee, B.F. (2016). In Curriculum</p><p>Leadership: Strategies for Development and implementation (4th ed.). Washington</p><p>DC. Sage.</p><p></p><p>Al-Mekhlafi, A., & Nagaratnam, R. P. (2012). From firm ground to shifting sands: Issues</p><p>in adopting learner-centred ESL/EFL pedagogy. The English Teacher, 41(1), 7189.</p><p></p><p>Altrichter, H. (2005). Curriculum implementation limiting and facilitating factors. In P.</p><p>Nentwig & D. Waddington. (Eds.), Context based learning of science Munster:</p><p>Waxmann. pp. 3562.</p><p></p><p>Aloka, P. J. O. (2012). Group polarization in decision-making: A study of selected</p><p>secondary school disciplinary panels in Rongo district of Kenya. (Doctoral thesis)</p><p>University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.</p><p></p><p>Aman, I., & Mustaffa, R. (2006). Classroom discourse of Malay language lesson: A critical</p><p>analysis. Jurnal e-Bangi, 1(1), 124.</p><p></p><p>Amir Salleh (1993). Inservice training needs assessment for Malaysian secondary school</p><p>teachers. Unpublished Phd Thesis, The University of Michigan.</p><p></p><p>Anderson, C. (2001). Designing systems to support learning science with understanding</p><p>for all: Developing dialogues among researchers, reformers, and developers (No.</p><p>available at http://www.project2061.org/events/meetings/textbook/science</p><p>/anderson.htm). Washington, DC: Project 2061.</p><p></p><p>Ashley, L. D. (2012). Case study research in J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe & L. V. Hedges</p><p>(Eds.), Research methods and methodologies in education London: Sage. pp.102107.</p><p></p><p>ASLI-CPPS, PROHAM & KITA-UKM. (2012). Report on education reform and process</p><p>of consultation. Retrieved January 19, 2013 from</p><p>http://www.cpps.org.my/upload/EDUCATION%20REFORM%20IN%20MAL</p><p>AYSIA%20REPORT%202012.pdf</p><p></p><p>Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from</p><p>a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of</p><p>Educational Development, 30, 83-90</p><p></p><p>Best, J., W., & Kahn, J., V. (2008). Research in education: Tenth Edition. New Delhi:</p><p>Prentice-Hall.</p><p></p><p>Black,P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of Formative Assessment</p><p>Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability.</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP), 1(2),</p><p>1-12.</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory</p><p>and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook on formative and</p><p>summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.</p><p></p><p>Brain,K.,Reid,I.,&Boyes,L.C.(2006).Teachers as mediators between educational policy</p><p>and practice. Educational Studies, 32(4), 411423.</p><p></p><p>Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press.</p><p></p><p>Carless, R. D. (1998). A case study of curriculum implementation in Hong Kong. System,</p><p>26, 353368.</p><p></p><p>Carless, R. D. (2004). Issues in teachers reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in</p><p>primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639662.</p><p></p><p>Caswell, H. L., & Campbell, D.S. (1935). Curriculum development. New York: American</p><p>Book Company.</p><p></p><p>Cheserek, G. J., & Mugalavai, V. K. (2012). Challenges and reforms facing Kenyan</p><p>education system in the 21st century: Integrating the principles of Vision 2030 and</p><p>Constitution 2010. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational, 406.</p><p></p><p>Chisholm, L., & Leyendecker, R. (2008). Curriculum reform in post-1990s sub-Saharan</p><p>Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 195205.</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y.P. (2012). Asas Statistik dan Penyelidikan (2nd ed.). Mc Graw Hill Education,</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.).</p><p>London: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Corbin.J and Strauss, (1990a). Grounded Theory Tesearch: Procedures, canons, and</p><p>evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.</p><p></p><p>Crawford, B. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of</p><p>practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating</p><p>quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Crump, S., & Ryan, C. (2001). Managing educational change: Issues, actions and</p><p>examples. Change: Transformations in Education, 4(2), 114.</p><p></p><p>Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Silver, R. E. (2012). Educational reforms, cultural clashes and</p><p>classroom practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 141161.</p><p>DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002). Developing</p><p>constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical, principle, and activities. New</p><p>York: Teachers College Press.</p><p></p><p>Dewey J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.</p><p></p><p>Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and</p><p>mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p><p></p><p>Ebert, E.S., II, Ebert, C., Bentley, M. L. (2013, July 19). The educators field guide.</p><p>Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.</p><p></p><p>Economic and Social Research Council. What influences participation in science and</p><p>mathematics? A briefing paper from the Targeted Initiative on Science and</p><p>Mathematics Education (TISME). London: ESRC/TISME; 2013. tismescienceandmaths.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/TISME-ParticipationReport.pdf</p><p></p><p>Edelson, D., & Reiser, B. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners: Design</p><p>challenges and strategies. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the</p><p>Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 335-354)</p><p></p><p>Esah Sulaiman. (2004). Pengenalan pedagogi. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers</p><p>College Press.</p><p></p><p>Fullan, M . & Pomfret, A. (1975). Review of research on curriculum implementation.</p><p>Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.</p><p></p><p>Fullan, M . & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on Curriculum and Instruction</p><p>Implementation.</p><p></p><p>Gotwals, A., & Songer, N. B. (2006). Measuring students' scientific content and inquiry</p><p>reasoning. In S. Barab, K. Hay & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the International</p><p>Conference of the Learning Sciences, 1, 196-202. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum</p><p>Associates.</p><p></p><p>Hanna, G. S., & Dettmer, P. A. (2004). Assessment for effective teaching: Using contextadaptive planning. Boston, MA.</p><p></p><p>Hasimah.Y., (2001). Primary science in Malaysia: The implementation of a new</p><p>curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick.</p><p></p><p>Hay, J. F. Smith & Paulsen, M. (2001). Teacher preparedness in inclusive education. South</p><p>African Journal of Higher Education, 21(4), 213- 218.</p><p></p><p>Holton, E. H., & Burnett, M. B. (1997). Qualitative research methods. In R. A. Swanson,</p><p>& E. F, Holton (Eds.), Human resource development research handbook: Linking</p><p>research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Indiana Department of education. (2010). Definition of terms. Indiana Accountability</p><p>System for Academic Progress. Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.doe.in.gov/asap/definitions.html.</p><p></p><p>Ishtiaq Hussein and Qaiser Sulaiman. (2016), Effect of Bloom Mastery Learning Approach</p><p>on Students Academic Achievement in English at secondary Level. Journal of</p><p>Literature Language and Linguistics, 23, 2422-8435.</p><p></p><p>Jan Hardman and Norhaslynda (2014) Teachers and the implementation of new English</p><p>Curriculum in Malaysia, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(3), 260- 277</p><p></p><p>Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks,</p><p>California: SAGE Publications.</p><p></p><p>Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research. A research</p><p>paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.</p><p></p><p>Kamsiah. O., Lilia. H. & Subahan. M., (2006). What Malaysian science teacher need to</p><p>improve their Science Instruction: A comparison across Gender, School Location</p><p>and area of Specialization. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology</p><p>Education, 2(2), 59-81.</p><p></p><p>Karen, C., and Jeannette. G., (2014, March 23). Problems being resolved. Plague with</p><p>difficulties from the time of its implementation three years ago, the recent review of</p><p>PBS has brought some cheer to the parties concerned. Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2014/03/23/being-resolved/.</p><p></p><p>Kevin W. Curry Jr., Elizabeth Wilson, Jim L. Flowers & Charlotte E. Farin., (2012).</p><p>Scientific Basis vs. Contextualized Teaching and Learning: The Effect on the</p><p>Achievement of Postsecondary Students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(1),</p><p>5766.</p><p></p><p>Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy</p><p>of Management Review, 21(4), 10055-1080.</p><p></p><p>Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research</p><p>Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.</p><p></p><p>Lee, M.N.N. (1992). School science curriculum reforms in Malaysia: world influences and</p><p>National Context. International Journal of Science Education.</p><p></p><p>Leedy, P. & Ormrod, J. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper</p><p>Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications</p><p></p><p>Lumpe., A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J. & Beltyukova,.S. (2012). Belief about teaching</p><p>science: The relationship between elementary teachers participation in Professional</p><p>development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education,</p><p>34(2), 153-166.</p><p></p><p>Makunja, G. (2016). Challenges Facing Teachers in Implementing Competence-Based</p><p>Curriculum in Tanzania: The Case of Community Secondary Schools in Morogoro</p><p>Municipality. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 3(5), 30-37</p><p></p><p>Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand</p><p>Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Marsh, J. C., & Willis, G. (2nd ed.). (1998). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing</p><p>issues. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Martin, P. W. (1999). Close encounters of a bilingual kind: Interactional practices in the</p><p>primary classroom in Brunei. International Journal of Educational Development, 19,</p><p>127140.</p><p></p><p>McMillan, J. H. (2004). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (4th ed.).</p><p>Boston, USA: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Alexandria:</p><p>Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved July 27, 2013</p><p>from www.ascd.org</p><p></p><p>Mears, C. L. (2012). In-depth interviews. In J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe & L. V. Hedges</p><p>(Eds.), Research methods & methodologies in education (pp. 170176). London:</p><p>Sage.</p><p></p><p>Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education:</p><p>revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA:</p><p>Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Miles, M. & Louis, K. (1990). Mustering the will and skill for change. Educational</p><p>Leadership. 47(8).</p><p></p><p>Millar, R. (1987). Teaching physics as a non-specialist. Department of Education,</p><p>University of York.</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012a). Ministry of Education policies: Frequently asked</p><p>questions. Retrieved February 29, 2016 from</p><p>http://www.scribd.com/doc/105793167/Dasar-Dasar-KPM -NCM</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012b). Quick facts 2012: Malaysia educational</p><p>statistics. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012c). Preliminary report: Malaysia education</p><p>blueprint 20132025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Minner. D. & Jacqueline. D., (2012) Inquiry into Science Instruction Observation Protocol</p><p>(ISIOP). Data Collection instrument. National Science Foundation.</p><p></p><p>Mohamad Idris Abdul Hamid., (2002). Kajian keperluan guru-guru sains Sekolah Rendah</p><p>dalam aspek Pengajaran Sains. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Fakulti</p><p>Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Montgomery, B., & Way, W. L. (1995, December 1st). Lost and found voices in the process</p><p>of curriculum change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American</p><p>Vocational Association Convention, Denver, Colorado, USA. (ERIC Document</p><p>Reproduction Service No. ED397269).</p><p></p><p>Mustaffa, R., Aman, I., Teo, K. S., & Mohd Noor, N. (2011). Pedagogical practices of</p><p>English language lessons in Malaysian primary schools: A discourse analysis.</p><p>Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 626639.</p><p></p><p>Mustapha, G. (2008). A reflection of the revised syllabus translated in textbooks. Journal</p><p>of International Management Studies, 3(1), 162169.</p><p></p><p>National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and</p><p>teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.</p><p></p><p>National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education</p><p>Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press</p><p></p><p>Norhaslynda., Rahman. (2014). From Curriculum reform to Classroom Practice: An</p><p>evaluation of English Primary Curriculum in Malaysia. A thesis presented in</p><p>fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Education at</p><p>University of York.</p><p></p><p>ODonnell, K. (2005). Japanese secondary English teachers: Negotiation of educational</p><p>roles in the face of curricular reform. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18(3),</p><p>300315.</p><p></p><p>Ofsted, (2013). Maintaining Curiosity: A survey into science education in schools.</p><p>Manchester: Ofsted; 2013; 7. ofsted.gov.uk/resources/maintaining-curiosity-surveyscience-education-schools</p><p></p><p>Orafi, S.M.S.,& Borg,S. (2009).Intentions and realites in implementing communicative</p><p>curriculum reform. System, 37, 243253.</p><p></p><p>Pandian, A. (2002). English language teaching in Malaysia today. Asia Pacific Journal of</p><p>Education, 22(2), 3552.</p><p></p><p>Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes</p><p>professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum</p><p>implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921958.</p><p></p><p>Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.</p><p></p><p>Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. AMC, 10,12.</p><p></p><p>Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought. New York, NY: Viking: The Penguin Group.</p><p></p><p>Ryan, J., Kang, C.Y., Mitchell, I., & Erickson, G. (2009). Cross cultural research</p><p>collaboration in the context of Chinas basic education reform. Asia Pacific Journal</p><p>of Education, 29(4), 427441.</p><p></p><p>Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: forward, central and</p><p>backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 533.</p><p></p><p>Sandelowski M.(1994) Focus on qualitative methods: Notes on transcription. Res Nurs</p><p>Health 1994;17:3</p><p></p><p>Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From</p><p>solution to problem. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 425</p><p>432.</p><p></p><p>Shihiba, S. E. S. (2011). An investigation of Libyan EFL teachers conceptions of the</p><p>communicative learner-centred approach in relation to their implementation of an</p><p>English language curriculum innovation in secondary schools (Unpublished doctoral</p><p>dissertation). University of Durham, Durham, UK.</p><p></p><p>Shumba, A., Mpofu, E., Seotlew. M., & Montsi, M.R. (2011). Perceived Challenges of</p><p>Implementing the Guidance Subject in Botswana Primary Schools. Journal of</p><p>Science, 28(1), 1-11.</p><p></p><p>Sidhu, G. K., Fook, C. Y., & Kaur, S. (2010). Instructional practices in teaching literature:</p><p>Observations of ESL classrooms in Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 5463.</p><p></p><p>Smit, B. (2005). Teachers, local knowledge, and policy implementation: A qualitative</p><p>policy-practice inquiry. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 292306.</p><p></p><p>Subahan M. M, Lilia, H., Khalijah, M.S. & Ruhizan, M. Y, (2001). IRPA Report: Nonoption physics teachers: preparation for better teaching.</p><p></p><p>Swart, E. & Pettipher, R. (2007). Understanding and Working with Change (eds),</p><p>Responding to the challenge of Inclusive Education in Southern Africa. Pretoria: pp</p><p>121-139</p><p></p><p>Syed Kamaruzaman .,(2003). Teachers Planning and preparation for the lesson plan in the</p><p>implementation of Form 4 Physical Education Curriculum for the physical fitness</p><p>strand. Journal of Education Science, 1(4), 38-47</p><p></p><p>Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument</p><p>to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128148.</p><p></p><p>Teresa, W., (2007). Re-Gendering Data: Quantifying Qualitative: Paper presented at</p><p>association for institutional Research. Atlanta.</p><p></p><p>Tweed, (2009), Designing Effective Science Instruction: What works in Science</p><p>classroom? National Teacher Association press. p.38</p><p></p><p>Tyler, R.W. (1957). The Curriculum then and now. In proceedings of the 1956 Invitational</p><p>conference on testing Problem. Princeton. NJ : Educational Testing Service.</p><p></p><p>Wang, H. (2006). An implementation study of the English as a foreign language curriculum</p><p>policies in the Chinese tertiary context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queens</p><p>University, Belfast.</p><p></p><p>Wolfinger, N.. H. (2002). On writing fieldnotes: Collection strategies and background</p><p>expectancies. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 85-95.</p><p></p><p>ASLI-CPPS, PROHAM & KITA-UKM. (2012). Report on education reform and process</p><p>of consultation. Retrieved January 19, 2013 from</p><p>http://www.cpps.org.my/upload/EDUCATION%20REFORM%20IN%20MALAYSIA%20REPORT%202012.pdf</p><p></p><p>Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological</p><p>processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</p><p></p><p>Wadsworth, B. J. (2004). Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development:</p><p>Foundations of constructivism. Longman Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Wang, H., & Cheng, L. (2008). The impact of curriculum innovation on the cultures of</p><p>teaching. The Chinese English Foreign Language Journal, 1(1), 530.</p><p></p><p>Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research methods in education: An introduction (9th</p><p>ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Winter, E.C. (2006). Preparing new teachers for inclusive schools and classrooms. Support</p><p>for learning, 21(2), 85-91.</p><p></p><p>Ye, L. (2004). Let the classroom teaching be more vital. Teachers Friend, 1, 4953.</p><p></p><p>Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of learning</p><p>information system on Mathematic achievement and classroom structure. Journal of</p><p>Educational Science,1(4), 38-47.</p><p></p><p>Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks,</p><p>CA: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Yildiz-Duban, N. (2013). Science and technology teachers views of primary school</p><p>science and technology curriculum. International Journal of Education in</p><p>Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 64-74.</p><p></p><p>Zaidatol, Akmaliah Lope Pihie & Habibah Elias. (2000). Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran</p><p>Perdagangan, Keusahawanan dan ekonomi asas, Serdang: UPM.</p><p></p><p>Zaliza & Safarin (2014). Unemployment Among Malaysia Graduates: Graduates</p><p>attributes, Lecturers Competency And Quality Of Education. International</p><p>Conference on Education & Educational Psychology 2013 (ICEEPSY 2013), Social</p><p>and Behavioral Sciences 112 ( 2014 ) 1056 1063</p><p></p><p>Zulzana Zulkarnain, Mohamed Saim dan Roslina Abd. Talib. (2012). Hubungan Antara</p><p>Minat, Sikap Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Kursus CC301 Quantity</p><p>Measurement, Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan 2012 (EduSem'12) Politeknik Port</p><p>Dickson.</p>
spellingShingle	LB Theory and practice of education Nagalaxmy Markandan The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district
thesis_level	Master
title	The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district
title_full	The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district
title_fullStr	The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district
title_full_unstemmed	The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district
title_short	The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district
title_sort	implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in jempol and jelebu district
topic	LB Theory and practice of education
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=4763
work_keys_str_mv	AT nagalaxmymarkandan theimplementationofreformedprimarysciencecurriculuminjempolandjelebudistrict AT nagalaxmymarkandan implementationofreformedprimarysciencecurriculuminjempolandjelebudistrict

The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district

Similar Items