A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns

Introduction Hypertrophic scarring after burns remains a major challenge for burn care providers. Pressure garments and silicone sheets have been the mainstay of hypertrophic scar treatment. This study was to compare the effectiveness of the traditional Lycra pressure garment and the silicone incorp...

पूर्ण विवरण

ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखक: Bujang Safawi, Ehfa
स्वरूप: थीसिस
भाषा:अंग्रेज़ी
प्रकाशित: 2011
विषय:
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:http://eprints.usm.my/37837/
_version_ 1846215955620823040
author Bujang Safawi, Ehfa
author_facet Bujang Safawi, Ehfa
author_sort Bujang Safawi, Ehfa
description Introduction Hypertrophic scarring after burns remains a major challenge for burn care providers. Pressure garments and silicone sheets have been the mainstay of hypertrophic scar treatment. This study was to compare the effectiveness of the traditional Lycra pressure garment and the silicone incorporated pressure garment (Silon) and also to determine patients’ satisfaction with pressure garment among burns patients in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Methodology This is was a two-phased study. Phase I was a retrospective study, which involved patients who were treated with the Lycra pressure garments from June 2007 until Jun 2009. Meanwhile, phase II was a prospective study, involving patients who were treated with the Silon pressure garments from June 2008 until June 2010. Demographic details collected included age, type and depth of burn, total burn surface area (TBSA) and cause of injury. The effectiveness of the treatment was determined based on the Vancouver Scar Scale score. Patients’ scars were assessed 2 weeks after complete wound healing, and every 4 months, for up to 1 year. Results Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant improvement in terms of scar vascularity, itch and pain within each study group (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference between the two pressure garment groups (p > 0.05). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference within and between the 2 study groups in terms of scar height, pigmentation and pliability. Majority of the patient complained of itch, sweating, discomfort and tightness upon wearing the pressure garments. In addition to interfering with their daily activities, they also reported no improvement of their scar appearance. Nevertheless, they still believe that compliance with the treatment is of great importance in order to gain optimal result. Conclusion We cannot conclude that the combined pressure garment and silicone therapy (Silon) was more effective than the traditional pressure garment (Lycra). Hypertrophic scars following burns injuries can take up to 2 years to reach maturity. Thus, it is recommended that scars should be monitored and pressure garment treatment should be carried out for at least 2 years.
first_indexed 2025-10-17T08:12:19Z
format Thesis
id usm-37837
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2025-10-17T08:12:19Z
publishDate 2011
record_format eprints
spelling usm-378372019-04-12T05:26:35Z http://eprints.usm.my/37837/ A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns Bujang Safawi, Ehfa RD Surgery Introduction Hypertrophic scarring after burns remains a major challenge for burn care providers. Pressure garments and silicone sheets have been the mainstay of hypertrophic scar treatment. This study was to compare the effectiveness of the traditional Lycra pressure garment and the silicone incorporated pressure garment (Silon) and also to determine patients’ satisfaction with pressure garment among burns patients in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Methodology This is was a two-phased study. Phase I was a retrospective study, which involved patients who were treated with the Lycra pressure garments from June 2007 until Jun 2009. Meanwhile, phase II was a prospective study, involving patients who were treated with the Silon pressure garments from June 2008 until June 2010. Demographic details collected included age, type and depth of burn, total burn surface area (TBSA) and cause of injury. The effectiveness of the treatment was determined based on the Vancouver Scar Scale score. Patients’ scars were assessed 2 weeks after complete wound healing, and every 4 months, for up to 1 year. Results Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant improvement in terms of scar vascularity, itch and pain within each study group (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference between the two pressure garment groups (p > 0.05). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference within and between the 2 study groups in terms of scar height, pigmentation and pliability. Majority of the patient complained of itch, sweating, discomfort and tightness upon wearing the pressure garments. In addition to interfering with their daily activities, they also reported no improvement of their scar appearance. Nevertheless, they still believe that compliance with the treatment is of great importance in order to gain optimal result. Conclusion We cannot conclude that the combined pressure garment and silicone therapy (Silon) was more effective than the traditional pressure garment (Lycra). Hypertrophic scars following burns injuries can take up to 2 years to reach maturity. Thus, it is recommended that scars should be monitored and pressure garment treatment should be carried out for at least 2 years. 2011-05 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/37837/1/Pages_from_Ehfa_Bujang_Safawi_1510-RD_surgery.pdf Bujang Safawi, Ehfa (2011) A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns. Masters thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
spellingShingle RD Surgery
Bujang Safawi, Ehfa
A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns
title A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns
title_full A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns
title_fullStr A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns
title_short A comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns
title_sort comparison between the effectiveness of lycra and silon pressure garments for treatment of hypertrophic scar in burns
topic RD Surgery
url http://eprints.usm.my/37837/
work_keys_str_mv AT bujangsafawiehfa acomparisonbetweentheeffectivenessoflycraandsilonpressuregarmentsfortreatmentofhypertrophicscarinburns
AT bujangsafawiehfa comparisonbetweentheeffectivenessoflycraandsilonpressuregarmentsfortreatmentofhypertrophicscarinburns