Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study

Introduction Constipation and its implications have received very little attention even though this gastrointestinal motility disorders are common in critically ill patients. Constipation is defined as failure of the bowel to open for 3 consecutive days. This condition can give rise few adverse...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
主要作者: Suhaimi, Norlida
格式: Thesis
語言:英语
出版: 2016
主題:
在線閱讀:http://eprints.usm.my/43762/
Abstract Abstract here
_version_ 1854968026522189824
author Suhaimi, Norlida
author_facet Suhaimi, Norlida
author_sort Suhaimi, Norlida
description Introduction Constipation and its implications have received very little attention even though this gastrointestinal motility disorders are common in critically ill patients. Constipation is defined as failure of the bowel to open for 3 consecutive days. This condition can give rise few adverse implications in critically ill patients such as more constipated patient failed to wean from mechanical ventilation, the median length of stay in intensive care increase and the proportion of enteral feeding intolerance were greater than non-constipated patients. Objectives To compare bowel opening between groups of patients who receive neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for treatment of constipation in ICU. Methodology This is a prospective study. The ventilated patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were admitted to HUSM ICU between February till October 2015 were randomly received either neostigmine infusions 0.4 – 0.8 mg/hour or syrup lactulose 15 mls TDS. Incidence of bowel opening, time to first bowel opening and any adverse reactions were recorded. Results 40 patients were randomized where 20 patients in each group either neostigmine infusion or syrup lactulose. Neostigmine infusion group significantly had bowel opening (pvalue= 0.027) and markedly had faster onset of bowel opening (p-value<0.001) compared to syrup lactulose group. There was no significant mean different in term of length of mechanical ventilation between two group of therapy (p-value=0.542). No complications occurred from the neostigmine infusion. Conclusion Neostigmine infusion was effective for treatment of constipation in ICU compared than standard therapy syrup lactulose. Continuous intravenous neostigmine infusion of up to 0.8 mg / hour to critically ill patients appears to be safe.
first_indexed 2025-10-17T08:23:01Z
format Thesis
id usm-43762
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2025-10-17T08:23:01Z
publishDate 2016
record_format eprints
record_pdf Abstract
spelling usm-437622019-04-12T05:25:21Z http://eprints.usm.my/43762/ Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study Suhaimi, Norlida RC799-869 Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology Introduction Constipation and its implications have received very little attention even though this gastrointestinal motility disorders are common in critically ill patients. Constipation is defined as failure of the bowel to open for 3 consecutive days. This condition can give rise few adverse implications in critically ill patients such as more constipated patient failed to wean from mechanical ventilation, the median length of stay in intensive care increase and the proportion of enteral feeding intolerance were greater than non-constipated patients. Objectives To compare bowel opening between groups of patients who receive neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for treatment of constipation in ICU. Methodology This is a prospective study. The ventilated patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were admitted to HUSM ICU between February till October 2015 were randomly received either neostigmine infusions 0.4 – 0.8 mg/hour or syrup lactulose 15 mls TDS. Incidence of bowel opening, time to first bowel opening and any adverse reactions were recorded. Results 40 patients were randomized where 20 patients in each group either neostigmine infusion or syrup lactulose. Neostigmine infusion group significantly had bowel opening (pvalue= 0.027) and markedly had faster onset of bowel opening (p-value<0.001) compared to syrup lactulose group. There was no significant mean different in term of length of mechanical ventilation between two group of therapy (p-value=0.542). No complications occurred from the neostigmine infusion. Conclusion Neostigmine infusion was effective for treatment of constipation in ICU compared than standard therapy syrup lactulose. Continuous intravenous neostigmine infusion of up to 0.8 mg / hour to critically ill patients appears to be safe. 2016-05 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/43762/1/Dr.%20Norlida%20Suhaimi-24%20pages.pdf Suhaimi, Norlida (2016) Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study. Masters thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
spellingShingle RC799-869 Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
Suhaimi, Norlida
Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study
title Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study
title_full Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study
title_fullStr Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study
title_short Neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) : a randomized, controlled study
title_sort neostigmine infusion versus syrup lactulose for the treatment of constipation in intensive care unit icu a randomized controlled study
topic RC799-869 Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
url http://eprints.usm.my/43762/
work_keys_str_mv AT suhaiminorlida neostigmineinfusionversussyruplactuloseforthetreatmentofconstipationinintensivecareuniticuarandomizedcontrolledstudy