The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract

For years, general contractors have often enclosed a contractual provision of “pay when paid” in their subcontracts providing that payment to the subcontractor is conditioned upon the general contractor’s actual receipt of payment from the owner. “Pay-when-paid” clauses while seemingly straightforwa...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
第一著者: Ibrahim, Nasyira
フォーマット: 学位論文
言語:英語
出版事項: 2009
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:http://eprints.utm.my/12402/1/NasyiraIbrahimMFAB2009.pdf
_version_ 1846215463230504960
author Ibrahim, Nasyira
author_facet Ibrahim, Nasyira
author_sort Ibrahim, Nasyira
description For years, general contractors have often enclosed a contractual provision of “pay when paid” in their subcontracts providing that payment to the subcontractor is conditioned upon the general contractor’s actual receipt of payment from the owner. “Pay-when-paid” clauses while seemingly straightforward at first glance but many are actually ambiguous. Instead of “pay when paid” arrangement waiving the right of the subcontractor to be paid, there is competing argument that this clause speaks to timing of payment. Hence, this research intends to identify whether “pay when paid” arrangement in construction subcontract waiving the right of the subcontractor to be paid or simply a timing mechanism. This research was carried out mainly through documentary analysis of law journals and law reports. Results shows that 8 out of 11 cases identify that “pay when paid” provision in the sub-contract constitute as timing mechanism. “Pay When Paid” provision may become either as timing mechanism and waiving the subcontractor right to be paid. Most of the cases cited that wording of the contractual language in the sub-contract is critical in identify the application of “pay when paid” provis ion. Unambiguously and sufficiently clearly contractual language must have been used in order for a court to construe such a clause imposed payment to the main contractor as condition precedent to the subcontractor’s right to be paid, rather than limiting the time for payment. Once a judge decides that provision is ambiguous there is nothing for the jury to decide or interpret. Therefore, the subcontractor may take the legal action to challenge the enforceability of the clause to seek immediate payment when they have suffering the risk of non-payment due to the performance problems unrelated to their own work.
format Thesis
id uthm-12402
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
language English
publishDate 2009
record_format eprints
spelling uthm-124022018-06-04T09:54:02Z http://eprints.utm.my/12402/ The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract Ibrahim, Nasyira HD28 Management. Industrial Management For years, general contractors have often enclosed a contractual provision of “pay when paid” in their subcontracts providing that payment to the subcontractor is conditioned upon the general contractor’s actual receipt of payment from the owner. “Pay-when-paid” clauses while seemingly straightforward at first glance but many are actually ambiguous. Instead of “pay when paid” arrangement waiving the right of the subcontractor to be paid, there is competing argument that this clause speaks to timing of payment. Hence, this research intends to identify whether “pay when paid” arrangement in construction subcontract waiving the right of the subcontractor to be paid or simply a timing mechanism. This research was carried out mainly through documentary analysis of law journals and law reports. Results shows that 8 out of 11 cases identify that “pay when paid” provision in the sub-contract constitute as timing mechanism. “Pay When Paid” provision may become either as timing mechanism and waiving the subcontractor right to be paid. Most of the cases cited that wording of the contractual language in the sub-contract is critical in identify the application of “pay when paid” provis ion. Unambiguously and sufficiently clearly contractual language must have been used in order for a court to construe such a clause imposed payment to the main contractor as condition precedent to the subcontractor’s right to be paid, rather than limiting the time for payment. Once a judge decides that provision is ambiguous there is nothing for the jury to decide or interpret. Therefore, the subcontractor may take the legal action to challenge the enforceability of the clause to seek immediate payment when they have suffering the risk of non-payment due to the performance problems unrelated to their own work. 2009-07 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/12402/1/NasyiraIbrahimMFAB2009.pdf Ibrahim, Nasyira (2009) The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment.
spellingShingle HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Ibrahim, Nasyira
The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract
title The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract
title_full The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract
title_fullStr The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract
title_full_unstemmed The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract
title_short The application of 'pay when paid' provisions in construction sub-contract
title_sort application of pay when paid provisions in construction sub contract
topic HD28 Management. Industrial Management
url http://eprints.utm.my/12402/1/NasyiraIbrahimMFAB2009.pdf
url-record http://eprints.utm.my/12402/
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimnasyira theapplicationofpaywhenpaidprovisionsinconstructionsubcontract
AT ibrahimnasyira applicationofpaywhenpaidprovisionsinconstructionsubcontract